Thursday, October 30, 2008
Sultan Knish has the lowdown on these Hamas rabbis
The group gets financial support from anti-American and anti-Zionist organizations!
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
from Pam Geller's Atlas Shrugs
THE GREAT REVERSE SCHLEP
BOCA RATON, FRIDAY, OCT. 31, NOON TO 1:30PM
· DO NOT MISS IT
· COME AND PARTICIPATE IN A MAJOR EVENT THAT COULD IMPACT THE ELECTION!
Sarah Silverman and The Great Schlep
ATLAS SHRUGS: THE GREAT REVERSE SCHLEP
Nisra Poller and I will be making appearancews presenting The Case against Obama: LETHAL FOR ISRAEL
The media is withholding the evidence of Obama's past. They refuse to publish the truth about Obama. The LA Times is Hiding Incriminating Video of Obama with Radical Palestinian. Khalidi, Ayers and Dohrn
Obama has received millions of dollars of foreign money. Contributions from Gaza, a Hamas controlled camp ... a million from Qaddafi and across the Muslim world. They are electioneering for him illegally in mosques across America. Unindicted co-conspirator and US front for the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR
The presentation—which will include a ten minute video—focuses on critical aspects of Obama’s ideology and longstanding alliances that the mainstream media have chosen to ignore, or whitewash, most notably:
His intimate, self-admittedly formative, and longstanding relationships and alliances with Marxist, Anti-Zionist, and Antisemitic ideologues, both religious, and lay, particularly Franklin Marshall Davis, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, and Rashid Khalidi
His endorsements by the most radical Jew-annihilationist elements of the Muslim world
Obama’s stated belief that Jew annihilationist terror organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah, “have legitimate grievances.”
The shared view of Obama and his running mate Biden that Iran—despite its repeated genocidal threats to Israel—be appeased, as represented by their joint opposition to a Congressional Resolution designating Iran’s murderous Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization, as well as Obama’s stated willingness to negotiate face to face with Iranian President Ahmadinejad, absent any pre-conditions. are on a reverse shlep to Florida to get the truth to the Jews before its too late.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 09:47 PM in
The GREAT REVERSE SCHLEP: Save the Jews Tour
Veer Savarkar, ideologue of Hindutva, saw the Jews as allies in a common struggle. In his famous Hindutva of 1923, he wrote:
"if the Zionists' dreams were realised, if Palestine became a Jewish State, it would gladden us almost as much as our Jewish friends."
Savarkar had been pro-Zionist since 1908 and remained so as Bharat's betrayers went in the opposite direction. In 1952, Savarkar looked to the Jews an example for the Hindu to emulate if they wished to be a modern nation:
"Even a tiny state like Israel has sensibly started developing fish field and sand fruits and because of that they are able to meet the needs of the countless immigrants who would have otherwise half-starved. The Jews are a brave and intelligent people. And although their State looks like a child before our great state of Bharat [India] we must emulate its example."
More--worth reading--at . . .
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Andrew McCarthy at National Review
Click on the above links
#1 lizzie October 27, 2008 11:02 PM Reply
I sent this to a Jewish woman who replied that Khalidi seemed a respectable professor. She wanted an intellectual as president, not a redneck for vice president.
Read the whole thing there
Last summer Barack Hussein Obama met with Palestinian leaders. What secret deals did he make with them? Did he promise to invade Israel and give the whole nation to the Palestinians? I wouldn't be surprised if he did. Barack Hussein Obama is an anti-Semite who has sat at the feet of Reverend Wright for 20 years. The same Reverend Wright who thought that Hitler was a great man and didn't go far enough.Mark my word. This is a prophecy I now give you. If Barack Hussein Obama is elected to the Presidency of the United States, he will find an excuse to invade Israel within 3 years of his Presidency. No wonder why every terrorist group from CAIR to Hizbollah is openly supporting him with money and people.
Hamas is campaigning openly for Obama
You get a phone call asking you to vote for Barack Hussein Obama and you say no. The caller on the other end is giving you reason after reason to vote for him and will not take no for an answer. You hang up on this rude caller and think that is that. But what you don't know is that the caller for the Obama campaign is actually in Gaza and a member of Hamas.
Read the entire thing at
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILYPosted Monday, October 27, 2008 4:20 PM PT
Election '08: Barack Obama tells Israel's supporters he's on their side. But he's using the playbook of Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian terrorist who said one thing to the West and another to the radicals who supported him.
Monday, October 27, 2008
New English Review
Indeed, it seems clear already that the Arabs have not always “failed to miss an opportunity.” They took the “opportunity” of Israel’s victory in a war of self-defense and turned it into the most successful re-branding campaign in history, repackaging the Jihad against Israel as merely a “struggle for the legitimate rights of the ‘Palestinian’ people” who were created out of the shock troops of the Jihad against Israel, the local Arabs.
Enough nonsense about those supposedly “tough-minded” Israeli figures – whether military men, such as Rabin and Sharon, who both were willing to offer disastrous surrenders, of rights and of tangible assets, or of those civilian politicians, Olmert and now Livni. Zipporah “Tzipi” Livni, as I have suggested above, is a playwright, the star of her own play, as a child-of-Irgun-supporters who, because she has "matured" and "developed" and become so much more of a "realist" than her poor benighted mother and father, way back in the 1940s could ever have been. What exactly she now understands about Islam that they did not understand is entirely unclear. And the theatre has been rented on a long-term lease, and the claque hired for many seasons to come, both paid for in the coin of Israel's security.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
New English Review
"What is both objectionable and wholly irrational is to vote for a Barack Obama whose career history is full of evasions, rank opportunism, multiple flip-flops designed to follow the blowing wind and full of evil (rather than just “questionable”) alliances (and not just random associations like ships passing in the night). Farrakhan (who recently hailed Obama as a “messiah”), Wright, Ayers, Pfleger, Jesse Jackson (of "Hymie-Town" fame)and Rashid Khalidi – not to mention Tony Rezko, and ACORN. These are all of one cloth and bode ill – for all of us. For a Jew, to deny this, is to court disaster."
A Reader's Comment on this article:
And what about Steven Spielberg, Barbra Streisand, and other prominent Jewish celebs who are blindly throwing money and endorsements at Obama without regard to his anti-semitic connections, friends, and alliances in America and in foreign countries? This just scares the crap out of me.
--Trish Location: CA
Barack Obama is the most dangerous candidate for the State of Israel since its creation in 1948. He is not, as Professor Alan Dershowitz recently put it, a "true friend of Israel" any more than Jimmy Carter was. He is certainly not "much better for Israel" than John McCain, as potty-mouthed comic dunce Sarah Silverman put it.
Any American Jew who votes for Obama ought to be ashamed of him or herself. He is not in line with a single authentic Jewish principle. (Authentic Judaism, by the way, believes the veracity of the Torah, Oral Torah and Talmud, not bagels, lox, Woody Allen and a copy of the Sunday New York Times.) On abortion, Obama is radically pro-choice. He is radically pro-gay rights, celebrating court-ordered gay marriage in states like California. Authentic Judaism is against abortion unless the mother's life is in danger, and against homosexual activity altogether.
And then there's Israel. Professor Dershowitz believes that American Jews should not vote based on "which party or which candidates support Israel more enthusiastically. They should vote based on more general considerations about what is best for America, the world and the values that they hold dear." I largely agree. I believe, however, that any candidate who does not support Israel demonstrates a disturbing lack of allegiance to our only democratic ally in the Middle East and a perverse moral relativism that will hurt America, not merely Israel.
I do feel, however, that American Jews have a special stake in the State of Israel. Israel does not just represent a family connection for Jews. It represents the ultimate protection for Jews the world over. When Arab nations expelled over 800,000 Jews in the aftermath of the birth of the State of Israel, Israel took the vast majority of them in -- as opposed to the Arab nations, which keep Palestinian Arabs in refugee camps to this day. Israel has saved Jews from South America to Russia to Ethiopia. Israel remains the last refuge for all Jews, and a guarantor of their safety, even abroad.
The future of Israel, then, matters to all Jews. By all indicators, it does not matter to Barack Obama, as detailed in a YouTube video counterpart to this column, "The Jewish Case Against Barack Obama".
Obama's foreign policy advisors have been almost uniformly anti-Israel. Samantha Power, one of Obama's earliest supporters, has suggested that American troops be placed on the ground in Israel to protect Palestinian Arabs against "human rights abuses." Power was a senior foreign policy advisor to Obama until she was forced to resign after calling Senator Hillary Clinton "a monster" in March 2008.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, serves as a foreign policy advisor to Obama. He believes that the Jewish lobby forces America into pro-Israel policy, and he defends Carter's anti-Semitic book, "Peace, Not Apartheid."
General Merrill McPeak, Obama's campaign co-chair, agrees with Brzezinski that the Jewish lobby, based in "New York City, Miami," controls America's Middle East policy. Continued...
1 2 Full Article & Comments Next >
Read it all, whether you agree or disagree with it, you will find allies among the COMMENTS pro and con at
The only way to win the war on terror (or on what is called “Islamism”) is to terrorize the terrorists.
To refrain from doing so because Islamic terrorists do not fear death is a strategic error.
There are two ways of making them fear death. One is their witnessing unceasing attacks and annihilation of Islamic terrorists; the other is their witnessing the destruction of the visible symbols of their deity.
Of course, the West is incapable of this kind of offensive warfare. Humanism or liberalism, tolerance and multiculturalism, preclude such ruthlessness. Sending our enemies to paradise is too much for self-righteous liberals or compassionate conservatives. Which is why the former abhorred, while the latter gradually deserted, the Bush Doctrine, by which I mean the following:
● Its forthright recognition of evil, hence its rejection of moral relativism;
● Its rejection of stability as the modus operandi of the State Department’s conduct of international relation;
● Its rolling back Islamic despotism and promoting democracy;
● Its recognition of the futility of diplomacy when dealing with terrorist states;
● Its resort to unilateralism in the face of an impotent and corrupt United Nations;
● Its recognition of the necessity of preemption in a world proliferating in weapons of mass destruction.
The war against Islamic terrorism cannot be won without exposing and overcoming the anti-American Cultural Left entrenched in academia, the courts, the news and entertainment media, and now the Democratic Party.
The virtual impossibility of securing the “home front” against these anti-Americans without statesmanship comparable in greatness to that of Abraham Lincoln. Therefore:
● America is at a historic turning point no less significant than that which Lincoln faced in the presidential election of 1860.
● Since America does not have a Lincoln, it cannot save itself. Which bodes ill for the survival of Western civilization.
● Only one nation can save America, and that is Israel. Which means that Israel would have to begin the unraveling of Islam.
● But Israel also lacks a Lincoln. It, too, is dominated by the Cultural Left.
● Is there a force in Israel that can overcome the Cultural Left? Can such a force be created? If not now, when?
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Click on above to read post
Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House of Representatives, says, “Every [American] citizen interested in our survival as a free and safe country should read [Norman Podhoretz] World War IV [The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, Vintage Books, NY, 2007, 2008,].”
I fully agree, and would only add, please do so before the November election.
Prof. Paul Eidelberg, President
Foundation for Constitutional Democracy
Monday, October 20, 2008
Sunday, October 19, 2008
I'm also troubled by, not what Sen. McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said, such things as, "Well, you that know Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is: What if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some 7-year-old Muslim American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated with terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America.
COMMENT: Apparently as ignorant of Islam and its koran and sharia law* as was (and perhaps still is) George W. Bush, Powell came out in favor of his "brother-in-race" and Moslem-descended (although supposedly having converted to a black-supremacist type of Christianity, centering on a black Jesus and Africa) Barack Obama.
Surprise? Not really. Although there are many black people who do not support Obama, even though he considers himself as black, Powell, who served in a Republican administration, considers himself to be "African-American." Unlike Obama, he is not the son of even one "African", but of two Jamaican parents.
*Islam is not compatible with the U.S. Constitution. A Moslem's loyalty is to Islam above any that he may have to the United States and its Constitution
from “Surrender Is Not An Option”—Perhaps, Perhaps Not" by Paul Eidelberg"
Condoleezza Rice, like her predecessor, Colin Powell, has been captured by the State Department’s permanent bureaucracy. This bureaucracy is dominated by liberal-leftists. Leftwing ideologues have dominated State for more than seventy years, and it requires a strong-willed and an intellectual fortified president to counter State’s leftist approach to foreign affairs. Such presidents are rare.
Not only is the State Department dominated by liberal leftists, and not only do they tend to be internationalists or globalists, but they know how to forge links with their ideological counterparts in Congress, especially when Congress and its foreign relations committees are controlled by Democrats. When Congress is controlled by Republicans, or when the president is himself a Republican, State knows how to obstruct conservative or nationalist oriented foreign policies. President Bush simply failed to appoint competent, conservative secretaries of state to implement his foreign policy agenda. Let us probe even deeper.
Few countries are more anti-American than America’s own State Department! State has been anti-American for many decades. In my book Beyond Detente: Toward an American Foreign Policy, published in 1977, I pointed our that the State Department, which consists of the most highly educated civil servants in American government, has long been tainted by the university-bred doctrine of moral or cultural relativism. This doctrine denies the existence of good and evil.
In Surrender Is Not an Option, John Bolton emphasizes that relativism or “moral equivalency” permeates the State Department. The left-wing culture of moral equivalency has very much contributed to America’s fainthearted foreign policy; especially its anything but “even-handed diplomacy” in the Middle East, as witness Annapolis. Secretary Rice’s moral equivalency in dealings with Israel and the Palestinian Authority is nothing less than moral reversal.
The enemy is not “terrorism,” a vacuous concept. The enemy is Islam, more specifically, Islamic imperialism, which dates back to Muhammad. But one cannot say such a thing in a liberal, pluralistic democracy, especially one whose intellectual elites are steeped in moral relativism, or in the multiculturalism that prompted the eminent American political scientist Samuel Huntington to write Who Are We? Mr. Bush can speak of an “Axis of Evil,” but he dares not attribute evil to any religion. That would be unadulterated racism!
And so, the day after 9/11 he called Islam a “religion of peace” and does so even now! Americans are given to believe that Islam was hijacked by “extremists.” Many experts foster intellectual dishonesty by defining the enemy as “Islamism” or “radical” Islam” or “Islamic fundamentalism.” Today, “IslamoFascists”—a more subtle piece of obscurantism”—has become au courant
We are told of “Muslim moderates,” and we are happy to learn of these exceptional Muslims. But take a random sample of the thousand mosques in the United States to learn about these moderates. See whether these mosques denounce Islamic extremists and preach peace with “infidels” as readily as they preach hatred of America, Jews, and Christians.
And so America, like Israel, is committing national suicide. National suicide is inevitable given the moral relativism American universities have been propagating for more than sixty years.
These universities provided the people that dominate the “shadow government” entrenched in the American State Department. Therein you will find the doctrine that led to the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 and Annapolis. Therein you will find that surrender is no longer an option because it has already taken place—first in the minds of men.
O once there was a wicked, wicked man, and Ahmadinejad was his name, sir
He wanted to kill all the jews, though they were not to blame sir
[what will happen when he has the wherewithall to incinerate Israel off the map? and how will he go about hunting down and exterminating all the world's remaining Jews?]
NOTE: Any Jew who votes for Obama will be complicit in paving the way for Ahmadinejad to attempt his dream.
Why? Because, worse than Chamberlain with Hitler, Obama legitimizes Ahmadinejad and his Mahdistic dream of cleansing the world of Jews (making it Judenrein)
“Just as we would refuse to sit down and negotiate with Hitler, so we refuse to hobnob with his successor in Tehran, who denies the Holocaust but promises another.”
--Paul Eidelberg: "What McCain-Palin should say to Barack Obama"
Some Jews find cause for anxiety
An SNL skit could be a sign that there will be anti-Semitic backlash after the financial crisis!
See the article at
[quoting the Bald-Headed Geek]
I don't have many "regular" readers, but am appreciative of the ones I do have. One of the people who hasn't been shy about posting to my blog has been a British reader who has posted under the byline "Najistani". No blog links were provided by Najistani, so I never knew exactly who he/she was, whether they were a blogger, etc.
Well, today Najistani linked to a blog called "supportthreresistance.blogspot.com". The site claims to support the British National Party, which as I understand it, is racist and anti-Semitic. The caption of the blog read as follows: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children". That is a verbatim quote.
So, Najistani, I ask you the following: Are you a supporter of this party? What is your understanding of the party's positions? Do you share their anti-Semitic beliefs? We may have positions in common with respect to Islamofascism, but I want nothing to do with the BNP or the positions it espouses.For my readers, here is an outline of the BNP's policies, which is taken from the British National Party's own website: http://www.bnp.org.uk/sms-news-texts/.
For a detailed examination of the party (and the anti-Semitic roots it has), check out this article in the London Times: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1672185.ece, or this analysis: http://www.wellingboroughrec.org.uk/news/BNP.pdf.
If you want more, just type in the words "British National Party" and do a web search. There will be no shortage of articles on it.UPDATE (9:45 p.m.): Turns out that my "Payback's a bitch" series ties in here as well. British blogger Lionheart, who I've defended, is a supporter of the BNP as well: http://djkonservo.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/wtf-britain/.Sigh...............
UPDATE (7:11 a.m., 1/13/08): A commenter to the blog asked about free speech
(regarding Lionheart. I believe in Lionheart's right to say what he wants, when he wants. Just don't expect me to support his other views, given his views on the BNP.)
[there are more comments that can be seen at http://baldheadedgeek.blogspot.com/2008/01/open-message-to-one-of-my-blog-readers.html]
NUT, here is najistani's answer:
Dear BHG,The BNP is the ONLY well-organised counter-jihadist movement in the Anglosphere.Regarding accusations of BNP anti-semitism, please check the following links then draw your own conclusions.http://www.think-israel.org/locke.bnp.htmlhttp://www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/brimstone2.php?leeId=80 http://www.somethingjewish.co.uk/articles/1009_bnp_jewish_win.htmhttp://ummahpulse.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=179&ac=0 - Najistani
January 14, 2008 7:44 PM
Also "Amongst my postbag was a scathing letter from Colin Jordon. According to him I am a sell out for stating that we have Jewish members in the BNP. At first I am a little wounded but then accept that criticism from someone with a sixty year track record of abject failure is not such a bad thing."- Simon Darby, Deputy Leader of the BNP http://simondarby.blogspot.com/2008/01/its-now-just-before-7pm-and-i-have-only.html
[close quotes of the Bald-Headed Geek and his commenters]
COMMENT by "Leslie White" (no, not an anglicization of "Leo Weiss" nor "Lenny Weiss" nor any other "Weiss," although there's nothing wrong with that name):
A while ago, I compiled an examination and opinion about the BNP, which I cannot locate at this moment. As soon as I do, I shall render an opinion about cross-posting with--perhaps not the official BNP but--with BNP supporters such as Lionheart and the Green Arrow (which I have done). As I recall, my opinion at the time was cautiously favorable.
The same study also devoted a section to posting some of Pat Buchanan's thoughts at my blogs. Although I agree with some of Buchanan's views, his antisemitism brought me to a negative conclusions concerning that endeavor.
As it stands now, it appears to be a hesitant thumbs up for the BNP and a thumbs down for Pat Buchanan.
As I stated before, I shall give you the reasons why supporting the BNP might be feasible for achieving a common goal, albeit a temporary one (depending on BNP's future actions and expressions).
Barack Obama's connection to radical Islamists such as Rashid Khalidi and Ali Abunimah have received scant media attention. Ali Abunimah, who runs the Electronic Intifada website said that he met Obama at many pro-Palestinian events in Chicago. In 1998 Obama and his wife attended a banquet at which the virulently anti Israel professor Edward Said was the keynote speaker. [See full post]
Friday, October 17, 2008
Pitching charity in a rough economy
Debate rages over attack on Jewish soldier
Haider's death removes key player in Austria
Akko riots expose Arab-Jewish tinderbox
Op-Ed: Palestinian statehood not the answer
J Street targets RJC's ads
Mud slings over chicken-swinging rite
Blind rabbi takes on pro-Israel incumbent
Op-Ed: Learning to love Obama after Clinton's defeat
Op-Ed: Foreign policy is reason to vote McCain
Activists slaughter their own kosher meat
Radical settlers using violence against Jews
GOP thwarts anti-Iran sanctions again
Neo-Nazis attack Hungary Jewish theater
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
In an article dated October 14, 2008, Iranian-born journalist Amir Tahiri writes: “PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held at [Evian, France] … last week.” Jackson went on to say: "Obama is about change. And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."
Jackson has more or less confirmed the present writer’s assessment of Barak Obama or what I perceived in his campaign slogan of CHANGE. But let me be more precise.
Senator Obama has nothing less in mind than regime change—a radical change in the political philosophy on which the American government is based, namely, the basic principles and values of the American Declaration of Independence.
This revolutionary document affirms that man is endowed with certain inalienable rights, among which are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. An Obama government would substitute a right to happiness for the pursuit of happiness. Such a government would thus be utterly paternalistic—a tyranny.
The Declaration of Independence derives our unalienable rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness from the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God. These laws, like any law of nature, are universal and immutable. They are not subject to the will or whim of man or of any government, be it a government of the one, the few, or the many. These laws transcend time and place. They transcend culture.
Obama, however, is a product of multiculturalism or postmodernism. He has been tainted by the university-bred doctrine of cultural relativism, which denies the existence of universally valid standards of good and bad, of right and wrong. He does not profess this relativism openly. Rather, he speaks of people’s cultural “narratives,” as if the cherished ideas and values of a people are purely subjective, hence, have no objective validity.
This multiculturalism is destroying Europe. It is destroying the nation-state and is thereby undermining America’s national sovereignty. Indeed, multiculturalism is leading to World Government via the United Nations. This means unmitigated tyranny,
Like any sovereign state, World Government necessitates a monopoly of power. In an era of weapons of mass destruction, a World Government would necessitate the equivalent of a KGB in every country to prevent any dissident group from developing such weapons—and they are being miniaturized.
It is in this light that we are to understand why Obama wants to cut U.S. defense spending. It is in this light that we are to understand his desire to redistribute the wealth of the United States to the Third World. It is in this light that we are to understand the extent to which Obama was influenced by radical socialists and communists like Saul Alinsky and William Ayres and has the backing of a billionaire like George Soros, an anti-American globalist.
Nothing in Obama’s upbringing and education offers the promise of a President committed to the basic principles of the American heritage. What else is to be expected of a man who, for twenty years, attended the church of “God-damn-America” Rev. Jeremiah Wright—an admirer of Louis Farrakhan, a Jew-hater?
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
"Remember, Barack: To please Islam you must appease...to please Islam you must appease"
from Jihad Watch
And Jackson apparently thinks that Obama will do so by abandoning Israel to the jihadist wolves. Will he also, as I have speculated, be ready to sacrifice the freedom of speech in his quest to build new friendly relations with Muslim nations?
"The O Jesse Knows: Jackson on Obama's America," by Amir Taheri in the New York Post, October 14 (thanks to all who sent this in):
PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held at this French lakeside resort last week.
More at http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023092.php
Note: Old "Hymie-town" is still at it. He is what he always was, and so to many a Jew's unpleasant surprise is their new moshiach (a farkakta one at that).
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Click on the above
. . . then think before you empower those who would weaken corruptly-governed Israel and give power to the Jew-Haters in America.
Code words? You can bet your life on it! This is not the time to go pussy-footing about so as not to rouse those who hate us no matter what contortions we go through to show them that we are fair, humane, help all regardless whether they wish for our death--and that of our children--or not.
Who are these haters that can turn words into action? Answer: Louis Farrakhan, "Al" Sharpton, the "white-haters" such as the "Rev"Jeremiyah Wright, "Fr" Pfleger whose "white" often is the code word for "Jews," and . . .
Yes, the black Americans that have been turned to hating Jews--regardless of the Jews who sacrificed lives and limbs to bring the vote to these self-same blacks.
What to do about what is poised to unload a whole lot of tsores on Jews once again?
Don't hate back. But also don't be a dupe and support those who want to--and will kill you, once the situation is right.
The Campus Jihad is directed against Jews (or Israel). Islamic students belonging to such organizations as "The Muslim Students Union"
UCI invites member of the Muslim Brotherhood to speak about democracy:
On October 8th the UCI History Department, MESSI, and two UCI research centers are bringing to campus a representative from the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. The event will discuss religion and democracy, and the supposed reformation of the Muslim Brotherhood. This event is one of many programs sponsored by UC Irvine departments which do not offer comprehensive views of the Middle East.Founded in 1928 by the Egyptian activist Hasan al-Banna, the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood is one of the oldest, largest and most influential Islamist organizations. Egypt has historically been the center of the Brotherhood's operations, though the group maintains offshoots throughout the Arab-Muslim world -- including in Afghanistan, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, the Palestinian territories (Hamas), Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Sudan -- and is also active in the United States and Europe. Islam expert Robert Spencer has called the Muslim Brotherhood "the parent organization of Hamas and al Qaeda."The Brotherhood was founded in accordance with al-Banna's proclamation that Islam be "given hegemony over all matters of life." Accordingly, the Brotherhood seeks to establish an Islamic Caliphate spanning the entire Muslim world. It also aspires to make Islamic (Shari'a) law the sole basis of jurisprudence and governance.
UCI to host Dr. Yaron Brook and Dr. Wafa Sultan for Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week:Courtesy of the Objectivist Club at UC Irvine, Dr. Yaron Brook and Dr. Wafa Sultan will be speaking at UC Irvine on Monday, October 13 from 7pm to 9pm, on the threat of Islamic totalitarianism to Western Civilization.The event information below:
Event Info/Host: The Objectivist Club at UCI
Date and Time: Monday, October 13, 2008, 7:00pm - 9:00pm
Location: UC Irvine HIB 100 Irvine, CA 92697
Contact Info: firstname.lastname@example.org
Terrorism Awareness Project is a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
The war against Islamic jihad and its religion of terror will be decisively won if we both understand the nature of the threat that confronts us and have the will to face it. The Terrorism Awareness Project will assist in achieving both these objectives. Under its banner, college students across America can take their place in defending America, which is under siege both abroad and at home.
If you would like further information about our campaigns, feel free to get in touch with us through this channel.
Country: United States
Click on http://www.youtube.com/user/TerrorismAwareness
The Path To The Final Solution
Anti Semitism and Jew Hatred potrayed on Palestinian TV
Islam for Kids: Mohammed
Islam for Kids: Mohammed
Iranians mock Holocaust on annual Jerusalem Day
TEHRAN (AFP) — Iranians chanted "Death to Israel" on Friday as Islamist students unveiled a book mocking the Holocaust in an Al-Quds (Jerusalem) Day annual parade to show solidarity with the Palestinians.
And in Gaza City, the Islamist Hamas movement that has ruled the impoverished Palestinian territory since June 2007 marked the day by calling for more suicide attacks on Israel.
The book "Holocaust," published by members of Iran's Islamist Basij militia, features dozens of cartoons and sarcastic commentary.
Education Minister Alireza Ali-Ahmadi attended the official launch of the book in Tehran's Palestine Square.
The cover shows a Jew with a crooked nose and dressed in traditional garb drawing outlines of dead bodies on the ground.
Inside, bearded Jews are shown leaving and re-entering a gas chamber with a counter that reads the number 5,999,999.
Another illustration depicts Jewish prisoners entering a furnace in a Nazi extermination camp and leaving from the other side as gun-wielding "terrorists."
Yet another shows a patient draped in an Israeli flag and on life support breathing Zyklon-B, the poisonous gas used in the extermination chambers.
Iran does not recognise the Jewish state, and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has attracted international condemnation by repeatedly predicting Israel is doomed to disappear and branding the Holocaust a "myth."
The commentary inside the book includes anti-Semitic stereotypes and revisionist arguments, casting doubt that the massacre of Jews took place and mocking Holocaust survivors who claimed reparations after World War II.
One comment, in a question-and-answer format, reads: "How did the Germans emit gas into chambers while there were no holes on the ceiling?" Answer: "Shut up, you criminal anti-Semite. How dare you ask this question?"
In 2006, the Islamic republic hosted a conference of Holocaust deniers and revisionists and a mass-circulation Iranian newspaper held a cartoon competition on the subject.
On Friday, tens of thousands of Iranians marched in Tehran, chanting "Death to Israel," declaring solidarity with the Palestinians and calling for Jerusalem and Israel to be handed to the Palestinians.
Demonstrators carried placards bearing slogans including "Israel will be destroyed, Palestine is Victorious" and "Holy war until victory," and they also torched American and Israeli flags.
In Gaza, a Hamas parliamentarian called for more suicide attacks against Israel as thousands of Palestinians marched to mark Al-Quds Day.
"We call on all the factions to undertake efforts to contain the enemy and halt its aggression by planning martyrdom operations," Ahmed Abu Helbiya told a crowd of more than 2,000 protesters.
Friday's Iran protest follows a fresh verbal attack on Israel by Ahmadinejad.
In an address to the UN General Assembly in New York on Tuesday, he said "the Zionist regime is on a definite slope to collapse and there is no way for it to get out of the cesspool created by itself and its supporters."
Quds Day was started by the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic republic, who called on the world's Muslims to show solidarity with Palestinians on the last Friday of the fasting month of Ramadan.
The demonstration was held under an official slogan: "The Islamic world will not recognise the fake Zionist regime under any circumstances and believes that this cancerous tumour will one day be wiped off the face of the earth."
jihad on campus: the msu at uc irvine
the muslim students association and the jihad network
Below are some upcoming speaking engagements scheduled for Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week:
UC Irvine – Dr. Wafa Sultan and Yaron Brook
Central Michigan – David Horowitz
Penn State – Robert Spencer
University of Virginia – David Horowitz
University of Wisconsin, Madison – Robert Spencer
UC Berkeley – Dr. Wafa Sultan
UC Santa Barbara – Jared Cohen
Brown University – David Horowitz
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee – Robert Spencer
George Washington University – Nonie Darwish
University of Pennsylvania – Dick Morris
UNC – Chapel Hill – Robert Spencer
University of Texas, Arlington – David Horowitz
University of Scranton – Robert Spencer
Washington University in St.Louis – Daniel Pipes
Texas A&M – David Horowitz
Stonybrook University – Robert Spencer
USC – Dr. Andrew Bostom
East Tennessee State University – Robert Spencer
Petition Against Hadith of Hate
Our student leaders have been presenting the Muslim Students Associations at their schools with the petition against the Hadith of Hate. The petition calls upon Muslim Students Associations to repudiate a genocidal Hadith which calls upon Muslims to kill Jews as a path to redemption. This genocidal call of the Prophet Muhammad to kill the Jews was posted by the Muslim Students Association on the official university website of the University of Southern California, until the David Horowitz Freedom Center initiated a protest that prompted university officials to remove it. This demonstrates that our campaign can succeed.
YouTube advertisement for “Stop the Jihad on Campus”
Please watch our YouTube advertisement for “Stop the Jihad on Campus,” and feel free to share the link with your friends and colleagues to raise awareness about our crucial campaign.
The Muslim Students Association and the Jihad Network
The Terrorism Awareness Project has released a video regarding the activities and behaviors of the Muslim Students Association, including information about the inflammatory anti American and anti Semitic speakers, often subsidized by student government funds, who are hosted by the Muslim Students Association chapters. You can watch our video here or at our YouTube Channel.
Valuable information about the Muslim Students Association is available on our website. Many of our publications are available free of charge here. If you would like to distribute these materials on your college campus, please contact us.
100 Campuses to Protest the Islamic Attack on Free Speech
Antisemitic graffiti at UC Berkeley
Saudis' Multi-Million Dollar PR Agenda
Antisemitism is pervasive at UC Irvine
2007-2008: Another Year of Global Academic Anti-Semitism and Anti-Israelism
Pajamas Media: Muslim Student Union Fights For the Right to Incite Murder
Funding Campus Extremism
Faculty member at UC Irvine defends Islamo Fascism Week campaign
The War Front
Revealed: Muslim bomb plot links to 'mega-mosque' in east London
German Police Commandos Seize Two Prospective Islamic Hijackers
Iranians mock Holocaust on annual Jerusalem Day
Iran: Death penalty for man accused of homosexuality
Holy Land Foundation trial resumes
Britain's Youngest Teenage Terrorist
Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts
Terrorism Awareness Project (TAP) was founded with a simple but crucial mission: to raise awareness about the threat of militant Islam amongst the youth of our country. Gripped by complacency and the omnipresent force of political correctness, our nation has failed to educate our youth about the holy war being waged against us and what needs to be done to defeat the Jihadists that are waging this war. Please visit terrorismawareness.org for additional information and important resources.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Granted things were not good at all under the czars. Pogroms, cossacks, and the white-hot hatred of the Russians for Jews. But, did the Communist Revolution, the implementation of pure Marxism make it better for the Jews?
Cosmetically it looked good for the Jews--everyone was equal to everyone else, all "workers," all voices raised in a world-shattering choir singing the "Internationale."
The major raison for Jew-hatred--the Christian religion, and the belief that "the Jews" crucified "their"--the Christian's-- Saviour was gone. No more religion, "we're all equal now."
But the Russians still hated the Jews. The Communist government did not like the Jews any better than the Russian people, although there were Jews in it--Jews in ancestry only, to be sure--and when the chance came for Jews to finally leave "the Motherland," they did--in droves (for Israel and the United States).
Communism may be good for the Communist Jews, in the short run. In the long run, the Communist Jews were still considered as Jews, although they may have thought of themselves as "international" or "global," identifiable only with the rest of the proletariat.
WHAT'S THIS GOT TO DO WITH US RIGHT NOW?
Plenty, because the Obama Machine, fronted by the dapperly-suited "Middle-Class appearing" but neither-this-nor-that Barack Hussein Obama, is following the blueprint by the Communist Jews Saul Alinsky (see what happened to the Communist Jews in the Soviet Union, alluded to above).
The Alinsky blueprint--get POWER via the Middle Class--get 'em on your side, then use "em to get the ultimate POWER, the Government of the United States."
Once you got that, with a Democrat Congress and the path cleared for a Left supreme Court, you've got the entire United states to do with as you wish.
Impossible? A looser interpretation of the Constitution, it no longer is iron-clad with Amendments necessary to change an iota of it? Impossible? Don't bet on it.
You can, if you've got a good kop, see where this is leading. The Americans--not the foreign Barack Hussein Obama ideologues, un-American in beliefs--will blame their iron-fettered existence in an a la Hugo-Chavez-in-Venezuela type of quasi (at first) dictatorship of the Left-- President, Congress, and supreme Court--on --You guessed it! The Jews.
The Americans, the people whom Jews should be part of, should, because being part of them is the only way to survive what is coming, will not take kindly to what is coming (what's that? see WHY DOES AN ISLAM-RESISTING BLOG WARN AMERICANS AGAINST OBAMA? )
You see, a Dictatorship (overt or covert or even clandestine) of the Left--viz Chavez in Venezuela, Castro in Cuba, etc.--is never good for the Jews.
Neither is a Dictatorship of the Right--although these in recent history have started with Socialism (Mussolini, Hitler--the only Fascist right from the start being Franco in Spain).
Message to Obama and his ilk should be: "ver tsuzetst!" although I would like it to be, but cannot express because of his position already, the more a propos "ver g---"
FAR-LEFT IS NEVER GOOD FOR THE JEWS. Obama is FAR LEFT.
[ . . . difficult to decide--against the Obama Machine, when your very being tells you to be a Liberal? Well, who said it should be easy? It is, as it always has been--since even before Moses-shvertz azayan Yid.]
from "The 2008 Election: The Defining Line for American Jews"
(You owe it to yourself to read this entire piece)
The assimilationist agenda of liberal American Jewry has metastasized with each succeeding generation to produce two Jewish Americas, one of committed religious Jews and one that has reduced Jewishness to an ethnic joke in the service of a liberal creed.
A river now flows between us and many of those on the other side of the river are not even Jewish in the ethnic sense and few are religious in any sense. Their belief system is liberalism, their synagogue is the activist's bus, their prayer book was written by Saul Alinsky and their messiah is Barack Hussein Obama.
I have never had much in common with their kind, but today I have nothing in common with them at all, for the commonality of a people must be based on a mutual commitment to that people, and in their list of commitments Jews come worse than last, not simply neglected but sacrificed time and time again on the altar of liberalism.
Whether it is bus bombs going off in Israel or rioting mobs besieging the Jewish community of Crown Heights, time and time again they have stood with the Arafat's and Dinkins', the Sharptons' and Abbas' over their own brothers, which makes them no brothers of mine.
More, much more at
Read it and take action
Oct. 7, 2008
Yaakov Katz , THE JERUSALEM POST
Brig.-Gen. Yoav Mordechai, the head of the Civil Administration in Judea and Samaria, will meet next week with his Palestinian counterpart to discuss a request to move up the planned deployment of a company of PA soldiers in Hebron.
The move, first reported in The Jerusalem Post three weeks ago, has drawn the ire of settlers from Gush Etzion and the South Hebron Hills, who held an emergency meeting Tuesday morning to discuss the "irresponsible and dangerous" move.
South Hebron Hills Regional Council head Tzvika Bar-Hai told the Post that Palestinians from Hebron had long been involved in terrorist attacks throughout Israel and that this new plan would only further endanger Israeli lives. "The writing is on the wall," he said.
On Tuesday morning, Bar-Hai hastily called a meeting of local leaders, activists and rabbis in his office so that they could organize to combat the plan. In the next few days they plan to lobby politicians against the initiative and they have asked for a meeting with Defense Minister Barak.
The settlers also issued a press statement signed by a wide range of settler leaders from Efrat Chief Rabbi Shlomo Riskin to far-right activist Baruch Marzel of Hebron.
The decision to permit the deployment - there are already more than 2,000 Palestinian Authority soldiers and policemen in Hebron - was made last month by OC Central Command Maj.-Gen. Gadi Shamni as part of an Israeli effort to bolster PA President Mahmoud Abbas.
Abbas is scheduled to finish his term as president on January 9, and in the absence of new elections - due to the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip - Abbas, according to the PA constitution, will be replaced by the speaker of the PA parliament, Abdel Aziz Dweik, a senior Hamas official currently in an Israeli prison.
Abbas, however, is looking for ways to extend his term. The IDF and the PA are concerned that Abbas's refusal to hand over the reins could set off clashes in the West Bank between Fatah and Hamas.
As a result, the IDF has agreed to allow a platoon of close to 200 Palestinian soldiers to deploy in Hebron, to be used by the PA to crack down on Hamas operatives and infrastructure in the city.
In a letter sent to Barak on Tuesday, the settler leadership in Hebron slammed the initiative, warning of a rise in terrorism if more PA soldiers are allowed into the city.
"Transferring security over Hebron to the Fatah terrorists will endanger the lives of the thousands who live here and the hundreds of thousands of Jews who regularly come to the city's holy sites," the leaders wrote to Barak.
Initially, the soldiers were planned to deploy in Hebron after completing their US-backed training in Jordan in late December.
A defense official said on Tuesday, however, that the Palestinians had now asked to transfer troops from other parts of the West Bank to Hebron as soon as possible, i.e. later this month. A final decision is expected following the meeting next week between Mordechai and PA Civil Affairs Minister Hussein a-Sheikh.
Defense Ministry officials initially opposed the deployment in Hebron, out of fear that the presence of armed PA soldiers would escalate tensions with the Jewish community in the city. Palestinian assurances that the soldiers would not patrol near the Jewish neighborhoods paved the way for Shamni's approval.
The request to deploy soldiers in Hebron was made by PA Prime Minister Salaam Fayad and is based on the "Jenin model," under which Palestinian troops deployed in large numbers there earlier this year and the IDF scaled back its operations in the vicinity.
In addition, Israel eased travel restrictions in northern Samaria and has started allowing Israeli Arabs to visit Jenin in an effort to rehabilitate its weakened economy.
Nevertheless, IDF troops operated in Jenin early Wednesday morning and discovered six pipe bombs and a 13-cm. knife. Shots were fired at the troops during the raid but no one was wounded.
Tovah Lazaroff contributed to this report.
This article can also be read at
Copyright 1995- 2008 The Jerusalem Post - http://www.jpost.com/
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
" . . . if Israel is destroyed, the West won't be able to depend on us Jews to
fight and die for them anymore. They will be all alone."
-from the following article
Our World: The convenient war against the Jews
Caroline Glick , THE JERUSALEM POST Oct. 6, 2008
In the end, the global jihad, and the West's fickle response to radical
Islam's assault on its civilization, is about hating Jews. This truth, never
wholly hidden from view, was exposed in all its ugliness in recent months
with startling disclosures by former Italian president and Senator-for-life
In a letter to Italy's Corriere della Serra in August, Cossiga acknowledged
that during the early 1970s, then Italian prime minister Aldo Moro signed an
agreement with Yassir Arafat's PLO and affiliated organizations that enabled
the Palestinians to field terrorists, operate bases and store weapons in
Italy in exchange for immunity from attack for Italy and Italian interests
worldwide. Cossiga also acknowledged that even when the Palestinians
murdered Italians, the government still protected them. Indeed, he admitted
for the first time that the largest terror attack ever to take place on
Italian soil - the bombing of the Bologna train station in July 1980 which
killed 85 people - was the work of PLO-affiliated terrorists from George
Habash's Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
At the time of the bombing, Cossiga was Italy's prime minister. Right after
it occurred, he blamed the atrocity on neo-fascists. In his words at the
time, "Unlike leftist terrorism, which strikes at the heart of the state
through its representatives, black terrorism prefers the massacre because it
promotes panic and impulsive reactions."
In August, he claimed that it was the work of the PFLP and asserted that the
bomb exploded inadvertently. That is, the Palestinians hadn't meant to kill
non-Jews - so Italian authorities protected them.
On Friday, Cossiga expanded on his disclosures to Corriere della Serra in an
interview with Yediot Aharonot's Rome correspondent Menachem Ganz. Cossiga
admitted that it wasn't just Israeli targets that Italy permitted the
Palestinians to attack with impunity, but Jewish targets as well. Indeed, in
at least one and probably two incidents, the Italians colluded with the
Palestinians in their attacks against Jews. On October 9, 1982, six
terrorists opened fire on worshippers leaving Rome's Great Synagogue. Dozens
of Jews were wounded and two-year-old Stefano Tache was murdered. Hours
before the attack the Italian police detail charged with securing the
synagogue was withdrawn.
Then too, in December 1985, Palestinian terrorists opened fire on the El Al
ticket counter at the Rome airport. Ten people were killed. Another seven
people were murdered in a simultaneous attack against the El Al ticket
counter at the Vienna airport. According to Cossiga, Italian intelligence
agencies received prior warning of the attack but didn't bother to share the
information with Israel.
Cossiga explained to Yediot, "No Italian targets were hit. They attacked the
Israeli airline at the airport. The murdered were all Israelis, Jews, and
Then there was the hijacking of the Italian cruise liner Achille Lauro off
the Egyptian coast in October 1985. Palestinian terrorists led by Abu Abbas
commandeered the ship. They shot wheelchair-bound American Jewish passenger
Leon Klinghoffer and threw him overboard while he was still alive. The
Egyptians freed the hijackers and sent them off on a flight to Libya.
American jets forced a plane to land at a NATO base in Sicily. The Italians
refused to permit the Americans to take the hijackers into custody and freed
Abbas. The Italians cast the standoff as a victory against American bullies.
But it really amounted to a surrender to Palestinian murderers. As Cossiga
explained, "Since the Arabs were capable of harming Italy more than the
Americans, Italy surrendered to them."
COSSIGA ALLEGES that his country's agreement with the Palestinians has
recently been expanded to include Hizbullah. After the Second Lebanon War,
Italy agreed to command the UNIFIL force charged with preventing Hizbullah
from reasserting control over southern Lebanon and blocking its re-armament
efforts. Yet Cossiga asserts, "I can state with absolute certainty that.
Italy has a deal with Hizbullah according to which UNIFIL forces turn a
blind eye to Hizbullah's rearmament so long as no attacks are carried out
against soldiers in the force."
Ganz notes ruefully that although Cossiga's statements provoked the Italian
Jewish community to demand that Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi investigate
the government's collusion with Palestinian terrorists, no such
investigation is likely to be forthcoming. Ganz explains that Berlusconi
himself is not immune to the anti-Semitism that caused his predecessors to
abstain from protecting Italy's Jewish citizens. When he addresses Italian
Jews, Berlusconi often calls the Israeli government "your government," and
so exposes his adherence to the view that Jews are not true citizens of any
country other than Israel.
The anti-Semitic belief that all Jews are Zionists and therefore all Jews
are fair game in the war against Israel - itself simply another round of the
age-old war against the Jews - allows anti-Semites to obfuscate the fact
that their anti-Israel rhetoric is simply warmed over Jew-hatred. People
like Iranian leaders Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Ali Khamenei, and Palestinian
terrorists from the PLO and their progeny in Hamas and Hizbullah nearly
always limit their threats to "Zionists," and so pretend that they aren't
Their razor-thin deception is eagerly embraced by their fellow travelers in
the West - from university professors like Juan Cole, Steven Walt and John
Mearshimer, to policymakers like Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski, to
Western decision-makers and European heads of state, and an alarming number
of American politicians.
This deception is par for the course of anti-Semitism. Throughout history
anti-Semites have used Jew-hatred as a way to rally their troops. By
attacking Jews as the collective enemy, tyrants have given their people a
convenient, weak culprit to attack to deflect criticism away from their own
failures or to hide real enemies from pacifistic publics uninterested in
fighting. Anti-Semitism appeals to people's basest instinct. But people
don't like to acknowledge how much they hate Jews, and Jews have always
preferred to deny that they are hated.
So anti-Semitic leaders have disguised their appeal to base instinct by
pretending that they are actually appealing to sublime aspirations. In the
case of the Nazis for instance, Adolf Hitler and Josef Goebbels appealed to
Germanic pride and love for the Fatherland. Today, the Left appeals to
people's aspirations for peace and justice. It is only by permitting and
indeed enabling Jews to die and the Jewish state to be destroyed that
"peace" can be secured and the Palestinians can receive "justice."
THIS STRATEGY appeals to European - and to greater and lesser degrees
American - policymakers for two reasons. First, as French Foreign Minister
Bernard Kouchner made clear in an interview with Ha'aretz on Friday, while
the West understands that Islamic jihadists seek the destruction of Europe
and the US, they believe - in part because their own anti-Semitism leads
them to exaggerate Jewish power - that they will get away with coddling the
Arabs and Iran because Israel will protect them.
Referring to Iran's nuclear weapons program, Kouchner said that no one is
particularly worried about Iran's nuclear threat because everyone believes
that Israel will attack Iran for them. In his words, "I honestly don't
believe that [a nuclear arsenal] will give any immunity to Iran. First, you
[Israel] will hit them before [they acquire nuclear weapons]. Because Israel
has always said that it will not wait for the bomb to be ready. I think that
they [the Iranians] know. Everybody knows."
What is ironic about this view is that it exposes the inversion of
anti-Semitic rhetoric. Five years ago, former Malaysian prime minister
Mahathir Mohamed told an approving audience of Islamic heads of state, "The
Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them."
But the West's belief that Israel will protect it from Iran shows that the
opposite is true. The West is absolutely certain that Israel is its proxy,
and that Jews will fight and die protecting it from the forces of global
terror and jihad.
THE SECOND reason the Western champions of "peace" have opted to sell Israel
and the Jews out to the jihadists is because as anti-Semites, Western
"anti-Zionists" fear Jewish power and therefore want us to be weak. So it is
that for the past 40 years, European governments and the US State Department
have bankrolled anti-Zionist groups in Israel like Peace Now, B'tselem and
Four Mothers. So it is that they have blamed Israel for Palestinian
terrorism. And even when Israel succumbs to all their demands for
territorial withdrawals, they always manage to demand still more.
In the same interview with Ha'aretz for instance, Kouchner on the one hand
praised Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni for
their willingness to surrender Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria to the
Palestinians, but argued that this is still not enough. Israel must also
accept the free immigration of the hostile descendants of the Arabs who left
Israel in 1948. That is, Israel must also agree to its own destruction in
order to pave the way for "peace." In his words, "The main problem is the
refugees and Jerusalem, but more the refugees. Olmert and Livni do not have
the perception of this."
Kouchner for one is certain that Livni will come around to recognizing the
need to allow hostile foreign-born Arabs to move here. "I think she will
change. This is always the case for people that are in charge for politics
and for life," he claimed.
Kouchner soothed the reporters' fears of national destruction by claiming
that he's probably not talking about more than 100,000 hostile Arabs
immigrants. But that's today.
If Livni does form a government and comes around to this view, leave it to
the West to explain that placing "arbitrary" limits on Arab immigration is a
human rights abuse, and that Israel's Zionist racism is compelling the Arabs
and Iran to kill Jews and Westerners around the world.
AND THIS brings us to perhaps the greatest irony of the West's collusion
with the Arabs and Iran in their war against the Jews. The logical outcome
of the twin delusions of anti-Semitism - that Jews are all powerful and that
the Jews must be cut down to size - is the destruction of Israel. And if
that happens, the West will find itself in jaws of the Islamic jihadists
they have been feeding the Jews to for four decades.
The West's subversion of the Israeli elite has fomented a situation where
many Israeli leaders have embraced their anti-Semitic views of Israel.
Leaders like Livni and Olmert, and the media and academia in Israel, have
largely accepted the notion that Israel is to blame for the global jihad.
Today these leaders uphold Jewish weakness as an ideal. The longer these
Western-supported elites remain in power, the larger the chance that Israel
won't attack Iran and that Israel will allow itself to be destroyed in the
interest of pursuing "peace" with Palestinian terrorists.
And if Israel is destroyed, the West won't be able to depend on us Jews to
fight and die for them anymore. They will be all alone.
Leftist lawbreakers deface commercial billboards diplaying ads from Judea and Samaria branding campaign
[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA: Don't expect the media to treat this Leftist
lawlessness the same way it would if a "Retreat Now" billboard campaign was
defaced. No one is benig asked to denounce the lawless activity.]
Activists hit territories' PR campaign
Tovah Lazaroff , THE JERUSALEM POST Oct. 6, 2008
A new public relations campaign that invites the public to explore Judea and
Samaria got off to a rocky start this week when vandals scrawled left-wing
graffiti across large billboards it had placed in communities such as
Sderot, Ramat Hasharon and Bnei Brak.
In one instance, the words "Murderers" and "Avengers of Sternhell" were
scrawled next to a smiling face of a biblical looking child holding a sheep
and in another vandals had written "End the Occupation."
The campaign's director, Yakir Segev, called on the public to refrain from
resorting to vandalism and to maintain a level of civil discourse even if
they disagreed with the campaign.
"Apparently the campaign has upset the extremists," said Segev. He added
that he intended to file a police complaint.
As a secular Israeli who lives in Jerusalem and who has no intention of
moving to Judea and Samaria, Segev, 31, is not a typical representative of
the settler movement. And that, he told The Jerusalem Post on Monday, is
exactly why he is the right person to head the public relations initiative
by the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.
Launched last week under the slogan "Yehuda and Shomron: Every Jew's Story,"
the initiative, which is under the direction of a newly created office
called "The Public Relations Administration," intends to veer away from
political attacks or security arguments, explained Segev.
It has one simple goal: to remind all Israelis about the importance of the
West Bank to Jews from a historical and cultural perspective. Already its
Web site has a list of tours it is hosting during Succot to help the Israeli
public learn about important Jewish heritage sites in the West Bank such as
Hebron, Herodian and Shiloh, where the Ark of the Covenant was housed until
it was taken by the Philistines.
Important Jewish history happened there, said Segev, but the modern
political debate has obscured that essential reason why Judea and Samaria
are important to Israel, he said.
"It is our land and that has its own value," said Segev.
As the former head of the Hebrew University's student union and a veteran of
the Second Lebanon War who helped lead the reservists' protests immediately
afterwards, he is not new to activism. But this is one of his first stands
in support of his right-wing ideology.
The hope, Segev said, was that if people were more familiar with Judea and
Samaria, then they would understand what was in danger of being lost when
the government speaks of giving up 100 meters here or there over the
pre-1967 border, said Segev.
Israeli society has moved to the Left precisely because it did not
understand this, said Segev.
In the past the Right had assumed that this argument would not secure the
support of mainstream Israeli society and it had therefore focused on
security as the essential reason why Israel should hold on to Judea and
"That was a mistake," said Segev. In launching this initiative, Segev said,
the aim is not to call on people to attend protest rallies or even to move
to Judea and Samaria.
"We are inviting the mainstream Israeli public to come and learn more about
this critical area," said Segev.
It has a history that has touched every Jew, he added. Most Jews around the
world light Hanukka candles without ever connecting it to a series of events
that took place in Judea, said Segev.
Even if one did not believe in a literal translation of the Bible, one had
to acknowledge that it was an important part of Jewish heritage and
tradition and as a result the region it described had value to the Jewish
people today, said Segev.
But Hagit Ofran of Peace Now said she did not believe the initiative would
be able to sway the public. The campaign was misguided and missed the point,
she said. No one is arguing about whether or not Jewish history happened
there, she said. While that was obvious, it did not mean it was wise to hold
onto it now or that retaining it was worth the price of occupation, said
[Comment: Occupation by Arabs?]
"They are investing much money in bringing people, but I'm not sure it's
going to change minds. People might come and see what we see, which is
occupation," she said.
But not everyone had a problem with the initiative. Among the many groups
which have agreed to host joint activities is the Society for the
Preservation of Nature in Israel. SPNI has several field schools in Judea
and Samaria, with whose help many area tours have been organized for the
An SPNI spokesman said it did not see any difference between its loose
involvement in this campaign and its past activity in the West Bank where it
has historically led treks and taught about nature and Jewish history.
Israeli Idiocy No. 2 (continued) - PA official: Israel has agreed to allow over 1,000 PA troops into Hebron
[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA:
Question: How many minutes did the Israelis think before apparently
agreeing to the deployment of over 1,00 armed PA troops to Hebron the very
week that Jewish tourism to Hebron will be at one of its seasonal peaks
Answer: The question is based on a false assumption. That someone "thought"
'Israel has agreed to allow PA troops into Hebron'
Senior Palestinian defense official tells Ynet Israel has authorized request
by Palestinian Authority to deploy security forces in Hebron in effort to
block Hamas' growing influence over the city. Hamas, meanwhile, passed
legislation calling for elections to replace Abbas
Ali Waked YNET Published: 10.07.08, 01:31 / Israel News
Israel is backing a bid by the Palestinian Authority to reassert control
over Hebron, a senior Palestinian defense official told Ynet on Monday
evening. According to the official Israel has authorized the request made by
the PA to deploy security forces in the West Bank city as part of the effort
to push back Hamas, which is poised to seize control there.
At present time Israel has yet to confirm such an agreement.
According to the source the deployment will be carried out as soon as next
week, around October 15th. The Palestinian force will be comprised of more
than 1,000 armed men. Israel has so far authorized the deployment of 250
members of the Presidential Guard and an identical number of police
officers. The PA is hoping to add another 500 troops from the national
The unique force will be tasked with battling Hamas' extensive political
efforts, which have been picking up speed as the Palestinians head to the
ballots in early January to replace President Mahmoud Abbas, whose term is
ending. Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad's is concerned Hamas will
take advantage of the unrest pervading the streets during the elections.
The Palestinian request was communicated through discreet channels to senior
diplomatic figures in Jerusalem. The proposal was also discussed in Fayyad's
meetings with US Special Envoy for Middle East Security, General James
Fayyad pointed to Hebron as the city most likely to fall into Hamas' grip.
The Islamic movement, which seized control of the Gaza Strip in a bloody
coup last year, poses a threat to the Palestinian Authority's rule in the
The London-based Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper quoted Hamas leader and former
Palestinian foreign affairs minister, Mahmoud Al-Zahar, on Saturday as
warning the PA the Islamist group would fight back.
"It is clear that these security operations are intended to oppress Hamas,
but they will only bring about the opposite," he vowed.
Hamas: We'll replace Abbas
Meanwhile Hamas said it would cease to recognize Abbas as Palestinian
president when his term ends on Jan. 8th and replace him with one of its own
leaders, according to a resolution approved by the Islamic movement's
The Hamas resolution demands that Abbas issue a decree by Wednesday to hold
new presidential elections within three months. Abbas aides said the
resolution appeared aimed at stepping up pressure on the president, a
political moderate, ahead of a new attempt by Egypt to mediate a
power-sharing deal between the two rival camps and is certain to deepen the
split between Hamas and Abbas' Fatah movement.
"I believe Hamas is coming to this point just to undermine the national
dialogue before it starts in Cairo," said Abbas aide Nimer Hamad referring
to the Egyptian-brokered talks, expected to start next month.
If Abbas does not step aside in January, Hamas says it will install deputy
parliament speaker Ahmed Bahar of Hamas as Abbas' temporary successor until
elections are held.
The job would normally go to the parliament speaker, Abdel Aziz Dueik, but
he is in an Israeli jail, along with scores of other Hamas lawmakers from
the West Bank. Bahar said Monday he would accept the job, if asked.
The resolution left a loophole, suggesting that Abbas' term could be
extended by parliament if deemed to be in the "national interest."
The Associated Press contributed to this report
Don't again abandon Hebron to Fatah terrorists
The Jewish Community of Hebron
October 07, 2008
Don't again abandon Hebron to Fatah terrorists
We were astounded and stunned to learn of plans to transfer security of the
city of Hebron to the Fatah and Tanzim terrorists, a.k.a. 'the Palestinian
We warn: similar actions in the past always led to terrible bloodshed. These
terrorists are notoriously known as criminal and terror gangs, whose nature
has already been proven from previous murderous terror activity.
The infant Shalhavet Pass HY'D, was murdered by a terrorist identified with
the Palestinian authority, and was trained by them as a sniper.
Twelve warriors, among them the Commander of the Hebron Brigade, Col Dror
Weinberg, HY"D, fell as a result of transfer of security of Hebron to the PA
in 2002. Another eleven Jews were murdered a week later when Bus 20 exploded
in Jerusalem as a result of the reckless plan called 'Judea first.' A wave
of terror swept through all of Israel, as terrorists from Hebron reached as
far away as Haifa, all as a result of removal of IDF troops from Hebron and
transfer of security authority to the PA.
The most recent victims of Arab terror from our vicinity, David Rubin and
Achikam Amichai HY"D, were killed less than a year ago by PA policemen.
Transfer of security responsibility into the hands of Fatah terrorists will
endanger the lives of thousands in the Hebron region, of hundreds of
thousands who arrive to visit the holy sites in the city of the Patriarchs
and Matriarchs, and the lives of all the citizens of Israel wherever they
Anyone and everyone who participate in this derelict, irresponsible act will
not be able to say, "Our hands have not spilled this blood."
Rabbi Dov Lior - Chief Rabbi, Kiryat Arba-Hebron
Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, Chief Rabbi, Efrat
Rabbi Gideon Pearl, Chief Rabbi, Alon Shvut
Rabbi Eliezer Waldman, Former MK, Rosh Yeshivat Nir
Rabbi Yisrael Rozen, Rosh Machon Tzomet
Rav Re'em HaKohen, Rosh Yeshivat Otniel
Rabbi Hananel Etrog, M"M Rosh Yeshivat Shavei Hevron
Rabbi Moshe Hager, Colonel (Res), Rosh Torah Academy, Yatir
Rabbi Uzi Sharbaf, Rosh Kollel Shalhevet Techiat HaAretz
Tzvi Katover, Mayor, Kiryat Arba
Tzviki Bar-Chai, Mayor, Southern Hebron Hills
Avraham Ben Yosef, Mayor, Hebron
Attorney Eliyakim HaEtzni, former MK
Ron Shechner, Colonel (Res)
Noam Arnon, Baruch Marzel, David Wilder, Boaz HaEtzni
Nadia Matar, Orit Struk, Yehudit Katzover,
Ya'akov Sharvit, Malachi Levinger, Meir Lapid
The Jewish Community of Hebron
P.O. Box 105, Kiryat Arba 90100 Israel
Tel: 972-2-9965333; Fax: 972-2-9965304
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Notorious terrorist released in exchange for soldiers' bodies filmed
training with rocket launcher, family of policeman he killed lament
realization of their worst fears: 'We feel sorry for the next family'
Yael Levy YNET Published: 10.07.08, 18:38 / Israel News
Eliyahu Shahar's family were perturbed, but not in any way surprised by the
images displayed to the world this week of Samir Kuntar engaging in weapons
Shahar was killed by a terror cell led by Kuntar into the northern coastal
town of Nahariya in 1979. It was during that raid that Kuntar also murdered
Danny Haran and his four-year-old daughter Einat.
An appeal filed by the Shahar family to prevent Kuntar's release was
rejected by the High Court of Justice. He was repatriated to Lebanon along
with several other terrorists and the bodies of hundreds of Lebanese
fighters in return for the remains of Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev.
"The Kuntar deal was despicable, we said from the onset that it's something
we would grow to regret," Yoram Shahar on Tuesday after watching the video
of Kuntar training with live gunfire and shells.
"What we saw in this movie is just the tip of the iceberg. Kuntar will carry
out a major attack against Israel, which has placed its fate squarely in the
hands of murderers," said an irate Shahar.
"I opposed Kuntar's release not because I was against having the captives
returned. I was opposed to watching the government throw sand in the eyes of
the public to prevent them from seeing the full picture, who it was that
they were setting free.
"This is a man who tried to carry out a terror attack against Israel at the
age of 14, and was arrested by the Jordanians. It must be understood - once
a terrorist, always a terrorist."
Shahar asserts Kuntar was released out of political considerations: "It
pains me that Ehud Olmert wanted to create a media spin, and so let him go.
"If people in Israel had the full picture, everyone would have been against
his release. You have to understand, this person sat in jail for 30 years
and spent that time priming himself for a major attack. He now knows exactly
where our weaknesses are," said Shahar.
Eliyahu's second brother, Haim, says the video proves the family was right
to appeal the deal. "I want the High Court of Justice, which twice rejected
our case, to sit down and watch these images.As someone who has served this
country, and who continues to volunteer even today, I am very upset. This is
how they (the court) pay us back."
Shahar stressed that his family was not out to avenge his brother's death,
only to prevent future attacks. "I wish I could go to Lebanon on my own,"
says Haim, "I would go destroy him. This is not a vendetta. My brother will
not rise from his grave if Kuntar dies.
Haim said that his family members paid a heavy personal price following
Eliyahu's death. "My mother died from the grief. Yet after everything we
endured, Kuntar was let go and now he's back to his old habits. This ruined
us, and he's just continued with his life."
Yoram said he laments the feeling of national helplessness: "We are the
strongest nation in the world. I ask Olmert - why don't we get (Hamas
leader) Ismail Haniyeh and trade him for (kidnapped soldier) Gilad Shalit,
just like they snatched Mustafa Dirani from his bed. That's the kind of
country I want to live in," he said.
"We just give and give, and the world's terrorists see this and understand
that hey, they really should carry out more kidnappings. We need to
understand that we are fighting for our existence, and I feel sorry for the
next family in line," added Shahar.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008